Asteroid management – interplanetary landfill
The recent close encounter
with Asteroid 1998 QE2 has drawn attention to the long term need to manage the
threat to Earth posed by these objects.
Since the realisation that an
asteroid was probably responsible for a mass extinction event that caused the
dinosaurs to become extinct, some consideration has been given to the means of
diverting Near Earth Objects (NEOs) away from a future collision with earth.
NEO programme.
The possibility of altering
the orbits of material that threatens the continuation of civilisation on Earth
offers the intriguing possibility that putative extra terrestrial cultures, not
much more advanced that ours, are already doing so. If a civilisation that is
significantly more advanced than ours were to engage in a long term asteroid
management what would they do with them? Perhaps instead of
continuing with an interplanetary juggling act, civilisation might decide to
consolidate the managed material into one large body that would enter an orbit
away from their own home planet. Although the unplanned addition of a new
planet to a star would potentially destabilise the orbits of existing planets
it has recently been discovered that some solar systems can have empty ‘slots’
into which a new body could be safely inserted.
New Scientist
The
Astrophysical Journal
The energy to undertake such
a large scale engineering project would depend on the successful ‘taming’ of
thermonuclear fusion. The current progress with the ITER project in France is some years away from demonstrating this
possibility.
But assuming that controlled
thermonuclear fusion is achievable there is the intriguing possibility that
that some of the extra solar planetary systems currently being detected contain
artificial planets that are in effect landfill dumps for unwanted material that
previously threatened the wellbeing of an extra terrestrial civilisation. It
might be easier to engage in this scale of engineering than the creation of an
alternative habitat away from the home planet. The processes that could make it
possible (thermonuclear fusion, rocket propulsion) are currently better
understood that the ecological processes that keep our planet alive. Paradoxically,
the control of thermonuclear fusion might be simpler than micromanaging a
replica earth.
No comments:
Post a Comment